The Same Guest Suggests Topics for the Blog
In the same email as the one from which the post below was taken, my friend suggested that we take on the following topics:
1) Historically supported definition of “Natural Born Citizen”
as it applies to the U.S. Constitution
2) Summary of the various conspiracy theorist positions on the following matters:
a) Apollo program walking man on the moon video done in studio
b) 9/11 “inside job”
c) the September 2008 electronic extraction of billions($) from the U.S. Treasury
d) Radio Frequency (RFid) surveillance equipment installed in the night on our interstate and privately managed toll highways
e) The “Amero” becoming the North American currency (replacing dollars in the US)
3) How can I make my habitat (home) solar energy supported where if the electric grid goes down I can still live in reasonable comfort?
4) If there is a “one world order” group of powerful international banking people/families and if so, which companies/institutions are in their pockets?
5) Is there evidence that the U.S. move to electronic voting in public elections has opened the possibility of election rigging?
6) What steps do the experienced survivalist thinkers believe must be taken to prepare for a breakdown of the food supply in the U.S. and subsequent breakdown of civilized human behavior?
7) What happened to the coverage of the AIDS epidemic in the mainstream media? Or the Swine Flu? Or CSARS? Or SOMALIA? Or IRAQ?
8 Where is the scientific position on the cure for cancer or its potential?
9) Is there a political push for a Constitutional Convention which would either abolish the term limit on the presidency?
… to which I responded:
Thanks so much for for writing. I’ll definitely think about this. A few thoughts off the top of my head in response:
Re: Natural Born Citizens. We’ve discussed this before, and I know this is a hot topic for you. Personally, I don’t see the big deal. If the electorate wants a certain leader, I don’t see the importance of where he/she was born.
Re: Conspiracies. I’ve tried to steer clear of these, not because they’re unimportant, but because I don’t have any value to add to the discussion. Personally, I believe in some and not in others, but I don’t have any independent research to offer — nor really even any independent thinking. This leaves me with conjecture and opinion, which I try to minimize. Also, see: http://craigshieldsquestions.com/911/. Some of my guests appear not to mind taking on things like this, so I leave it to them.
Re: Survival Technologies. Here too I don’t have anything to say. Obviously, there are people who do this all the time, all over the US, and for a variety of reasons; many of them are survivalists who don’t want to be dependent on a nation that they perceive as becoming more corrupt every day–and I understand that. And the technology they employ, of course, is a function of where they’ve chosen to go: if they’re in the desert, it’s solar; if they’re next to a river, it’s hydrokinetic, etc.
Re: The Media. I’ve been a vocal critic of the feckless and cowardly corporate-owned media. In fact, I think it’s a big reason for the loss of US leadership on the worldwide stage. The media’s job now is to distract and entertain a couple of hundred million sheep. As I wrote here: http://craigshieldsquestions.com/craig-shields-on-the-civilization-that-nearly-everyone-wants/ there is very little insight and critical thinking that takes our leaders (public and private) to task for even their most blatent crimes.
Again, I’ll try to take on your ideas where I feel I can add something meaningful. Thanks again for writing!